Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

Why Downloading Pirated Music Pinches! »

Posted By omerazam 2 months, 3 weeks ago in Arts & Entertainment
7.7

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 435

Propped: 70

Comments: 4

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Nobody likes being called a thief, even those that download pirated music online. But the fact remains that people who perform free music downloads or buy music online using credit cards, from controversial web sites may be part of international piracy

Read Full Story at templatesfactory.net »

4 Comments Report

Submitted By:
omerazam

New to Social Media and trying to learn the skills, here to socialze with people who are active in this field.

Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 4
  • 0%
    CHAM2 months, 3 weeks ago

    Piracy is a problem and there are many other scams involved that don't get the same attention. I once called the Attorney General and believe it or not talked to a representative ( they said . Anyway the gist of my call was that if the AG really wanted to stop piracy, scams, etc. all they had to do was bring charges against the phone providers because every telecom has the ability to log all calls ( this is the way they make their bill ). The telecoms can spy on you but they don't have to help the AG find a thief.

    I never could see why people would pirate a song when they can buy it legitimally from Wal-Mart on line for 88 cents. I've bpought several that way.

    Reply
    • 0%
      pc252 months, 3 weeks ago

      It has made a huge impact on my studio business

      Reply
      • 0%
        chevydog2 months, 3 weeks ago

        I believe that copyright protection should not be an unconditional right; but rather it should bedependent on periodic, well-publicized making available of music.

        The argument that one hears most against illegal downloading is that it takes money out of the pocket of the copyright holder. But if a holder after X period of time (10?, 15?, 20? years) does nothing to distribute a work, is he not in effect saying that he sees no commercial prospects for it? I would be disinclined to provide copyright ptotection to someone who clearly has rejected hope of commercial viability.

        Reply
        • 0%
          riverdog2 months, 3 weeks ago

          Chevydog I disagree, original material should always be be granted copyright protection regardless of time lapse. Just because someone is or was unable to promulgate commercial viability of his/her product does not mean that the product should lose it's protection. You/I/we have no idead what the reasons behind an artists failure to create commercial viability are, were or will be. It's almost impossible to get signed anymore, record companies aren't willing to risk as they did in the past. Indie's are out there going it alone and most of them are terrible at self promotion. The music industry in either dying from illegal file sharing or currently in such a flux state that there aren't any guarantees or rules on this road to the future. Not too mention things like divorce, ill health and a muried of possible personal circumstances that could or have diminished the rightful author's ability to capitalize upon his/her creation.

          Reply

          Add a Comment

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          Got a Story?

          Story Tags ?

          Groups Watching This

          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

          Advertisement